What is a systematic internaliser?
A Systematic Internaliser (“SI”) is an investment firm which is a counterparty dealing with its proprietary capital and is not a trading venue.
The formal definition is provided in Article 4(1)(20) of MiFID II, which states that SIs are investment firms which on an organised, frequent, systematic and substantial basis, deal on own account when executing client orders outside a regulated market (“RM”), multilateral trading facility (“MTF”) or organised trading facility (“OTF”) (together, “Trading Venues”) without operating a multilateral system. We’ve broken down this definition into its constituent elements and their meanings in the following table.
Difference between SIs and Trading Venues
While Trading Venues are facilities in which multiple third-party buying and selling interests interact in the system, a systematic internaliser is not permitted to bring together third-party buying and selling interests in functionally the same way as a Trading Venue. Such activity requires authorisation as an MTF. The main differences in characteristics are as follows.
Take a look at our infographic on Trading Venues and SIs comparing these characteristics between SIs and the types of Trading Venue.
When will counterparties become SIs?
The status of a firm as an SI needs to be measured against the relevant criteria on a quarterly basis, based on data from the past six months. Based on the dates on which ESMA is scheduled to publish trade volume data which is necessary for this assessment (described in the section immediately below), an assessment of SI status must be made starting on 1 September 2018.
Publication of trade volume data (relevant for determining whether trades are carried out on a substantial basis
Regulation 2017/565/EU provides that whether an investment firm is dealing on own account on a substantial basis is to be determined with reference to the volume of OTC transactions as a proportion of the total turnover in that class of derivatives for the investment firm, or of the total turnover in that class in the European Union, both either on a Trading Venue or OTC. Where the latter is used, ESMA’s published values will be used to determine total trading volumes in the Union, which is published with the following timeframes.
For equity, equity-like and bond instruments.;
- 1 August 2018: ESMA has published information on the total number and the volume of transactions executed in the European Union for the first time on 1 August 2018, covering the period from 3 January 2018 to 30 June 2018 The results of the data is published and will be updated on the ESMA website in spreadsheet format which can be accessed here.
- 1 September 2018: Was when investment firms had to undertake their first assessment by this date and comply with the SI obligations where appropriate (including notifying their National Competent Authority).
For ETCs, ETNs, SFPs, securitised derivatives, emission allowances and derivatives;
- 1 February 2019: ESMA will publish information on the total number and the volume of transactions executed in the European Union for the first time by 1 February 2019, covering the period from 1 July 2018 to 31 December 2018
- 1 March 2019: investment firms must undertake their first assessment by this date and comply with the SI obligations where appropriate (including notifying their National Competent Authority).
Quarterly updates: for subsequent assessments, ESMA will publish data by the first calendar day of February, May, August and November. Investment firms are expected to perform the calculations and comply with the SI regime by the fifteenth calendar day of February, May, August and November respectively.
The earliest mandatory deadline on which firms must comply with the SI regime, when necessary, is 1 September 2018 although MiFID II and MiFIR apply from 3 January 2018. However, ESMA stresses that investment firms can opt-in to the SI regime for all financial instruments from 3 January 2018 as a means of complying, for example, with the trading obligation for shares.
Asset classes within the scope of the SI regime
Whereas under MiFID I the systematic internaliser regime applied solely to shares/equities, it applies under MiFID II to a much broader range of asset classes:
- equity-like instruments (ETFs, depositary receipts, certificates and other equity-like instruments), and
- non-equity instruments (derivatives, bonds, structured finance products and emission allowances).
SIs and Matched Principal Trading
Pursuant to Delegated Regulation 2017/5812 as regards the specification of the definition of systematic internalisers, a systematic internaliser is not allowed to engage, on a regular basis, in the matching of buying and selling interests via MPT or other types of de facto riskless back-to-back transactions in a given financial instrument outside a Trading Venue.
Recital 19 of Delegated Regulation 2017/565 provides that an internal matching system for matching for client orders constitutes MPT on a regular and not occasional basis. ESMA has clarified in its MiFID II and MiFIR market structures topics of 18 December 2017 that an SI would not be engaging in matched principal transactions on an occasional and non-regular basis if the investment firm:
- operates a system intended to match client orders;
- has a recurrent or significant source of revenue derived from non-risk facing activities; or
- markets or promotes its matched principal basis.
Obligations of SIs
As an SI deals on own account and so uses proprietary capital rather than that of clients or counterparties, it is risk-facing and therefore restrictions are imposed to safeguard other market actors from the risks created. The purpose of the SI regime is to allow identification of firms that function as SIs so that appropriate regulatory obligations can be imposed. It also precludes the need to obtain the relevant authorisations for Trading Venues.
An investment firm that meets the criteria for the SI regime needs to notify their national competent authority (“NCA”) by 1 September 2018. SIs are subject to pre- and post-trade transparency requirements. They must make public pre-trade quotes (on request or by choice) through a Trading Venue, Approved Publication Arrangement (“APA”) or on the firm’s website. Accordingly, SIs will need to establish means for responding to requests for quotes. They are also subject to post-trade transaction reporting requirements, whereby a wide range of information in relation to the trades executed needs to be reported to an Approved Reporting Mechanism (“ARM”). SIs will need to have systems in place for gathering and report relevant data.
Forex brokers (“FX”) and Contract-for-Difference (“CFD”) brokers: Am I an SI?
FX brokers and CFD brokers are unlikely to be classified as SIs due to the products they offer do not fall within the scope of SI regime.
If you would like to discuss any aspects of this article or understand how you can comply with your transaction reporting requirements as an SI, please call us on +44 20 8050 1317 in the UK or +357 25 123 309 in Cyprus.
Quinn is co-CEO and founder of TRAction focuses on assisting clients in Europe, Asia and Australia to meet their regulatory requirements with trade and transaction reporting solutions as well as development of the best execution platform. With a background in IT, Quinn started in the financial markets as IT Manager for City Index. He then co-founded and worked as a General Manager at one of Australia’s largest margin FX and CFD providers. Quinn has provided educational sessions to Australia’s regulatory bodies in relation to operational aspects of derivatives and trading platforms.